A National Legal-Action Antismoking Organization
Entirely Supported by Tax-Deductible Contributions
| Home | Search | About ASH | Why Join | Comment | Email page |
|
Action on Smoking and Health
A National Legal-Action Antismoking Organization Entirely Supported by Tax-Deductible Contributions
|
U.S. Food Service Workers at Greatest Risk of Secondhand Smoke Exposure [04/14-5]
Excerpts from: U.S. Food Service Workers at Greatest Risk of Secondhand Smoke Exposure
PR Newswire [04/13/04]
More than half of the nation's food
service workers are at risk from exposure to job-related secondhand smoke
according to a study funded by the American Legacy Foundation. In a ranking
of 38 major occupations, food service workers ranked at the bottom of those
workers protected by smoke-free workplace policies. White-collar workers,
including teachers and healthcare workers, have the greatest protections from
secondhand smoke on the job.
Secondhand smoke is a leading preventable cause of death among nonsmokers in the United States, causing an estimated 38,000 deaths per year according to the Centers for Disease Control(1). But millions more get sick from asthma, pneumonia, bronchitis and other respiratory diseases related to secondhand smoke exposure(2). American Legacy Foundation President and CEO Dr. Cheryl Healton says this bottom-tier smoke-free policies ranking for bar and restaurant workers is an important and life-saving social justice issue.
Even among food service workers, considerable variation was seen in those with a smoke-free policy. Individuals whose job responsibilities involved direct interaction with customers reported significantly lower rates of smoke- free policies than those who were primarily involved in food preparation and cooking. Nearly 70 percent of kitchen workers had smoke-free policies, compared to 28 percent of waiters/waitresses and just 13 percent of bartenders.
Food service is the fourth-largest occupation in the United States, employing nearly 7 million workers, and is one of the fastest-growing segments of the workforce, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
This new study "Disparities in Smoke-free Workplace Policies Among Food Service Workers," also found that when smoke-free policies are implemented, compliance is overwhelmingly not a problem. Among the nearly 70 percent of U.S. workers with smoke-free policies, only four percent reported a violation. Food service workers, however, reported somewhat higher rates of noncompliance than other workers, thus exposing more of these individuals to the hazards of job-related secondhand smoke.
The study is published in the April issue of the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, and authored by Donald R. Shopland of the U.S. Public Health Service (retired), Ringgold, GA; Christy Anderson and David Burns of the University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA; and Karen Gerlach of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ. The study is based on responses from more than 250,000 indoor workers interviewed for the Current Population Survey (CPS) between 1993 and 1999. The CPS is the federal government's major source of information on labor force statistics.
"Smoking was eliminated from all commercial airline flights in the U.S. more than a decade ago because of concern for the health of flight attendants," said Dr. Karen Gerlach of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and one of the co-authors of the study. "It's time we extend that same level of protection to the nearly 7 million food service workers in the country," she added. Currently, five states -- California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine and New York -- have laws mandating that all places of employment, including restaurants and bars, be smoke-free. Massachusetts also passed similar legislation that is now awaiting the governor's signature. Florida, Idaho, and Utah have also enacted statewide smoke-free laws, that extend to most restaurants and some bars.
Smoke-free laws covering restaurants protect both employees and patrons and according to recent polls in New York City, these policies do not hurt business. Shortly after the New York City law went into effect, surveys of New Yorkers indicated that they were frequenting restaurants, bars and clubs more often than before the law went into effect(3). The law has been in place for one year and sales tax records indicate that the smoking ban is associated with an increase in business revenue(4).
click here to view the abstract of this report from Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
| Home Web Page | Search This Site | Learn About ASH | Why Join ASH | Comment on This | Email This Page |